Utilización de rúbricas en educación básica: Revisión y recomendaciones
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18222/eae.v35.10803Palabras clave:
Rúbricas, Evaluación, Éxito Académico, Motivación para el AprendizajeResumen
Esta revisión narrativa de 17 estudios sobre el uso de rúbricas y otras herramientas relacionadas con criterios en la educación básica tuvo dos propósitos. El primero de ellos fue el de analizar estudios relativos tan solo a la educación básica y media, porque los análisis anteriores tenían mucho que ver con los estudios vinculados a la educación superior. El segundo fue el de utilizar tales estudios como base para recomendaciones que puedan ser útiles a los docentes en clase y a los responsables por la formación de profesores y administradores escolares que con ellos trabajan. De la presente revisión resultaron tres recomendaciones para el uso de rúbricas con alumnos de educación básica y media: 1) asegurar que dichas rúbricas sean de alta calidad; 2) planear actividades que involucren activamente alumnos y rúbricas; 3) utilizar rúbricas para vincular la evaluación formativa y la clasificación.
Descargas
Citas
Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18.
Auxtero, L. C., & Callaman, R. A. (2021). Rubric as a learning tool in teaching application of derivatives in basic calculus. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 6(1), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i1.11449
Bradford, K. L., Newland, A. C., Rule, A. C., & Montgomery, S. E. (2016). Rubrics as a tool in writing instruction: Effects on the opinion essays of first and second graders. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(5), 463-472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0727-0
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.
Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Appropriate criteria: Key to effective rubrics. Frontiers in Education, 3, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00022
Brookhart, S. M., & Chen, F. (2015). The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubrics. Educational Review, 67(3), 343-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2014.929565
Chen, F., & Andrade, H. (2018). The impact of criteria-referenced formative assessment on fifth grade students’ theater arts achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 111(3), 310-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1255870
Chen, F., Lui, A., Andrade, H., Valle, C., & Mir, H. (2017). Criteria-referenced formative assessment in the arts. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 29(3), 297-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-017-9259-z
Gallego-Arrufat, M. J., & Dandis, M. (2014). Rubrics in a secondary mathematics class. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(1-2), 75-84. https://www.iejme.com/download/rubrics-in-a-secondary-mathematics-class.pdf
Hsia, L., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. (2016). A web-based peer-assessment approach to improving junior high school students’ performance, self-efficacy, and motivation in performing arts courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 618-632. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1103675
Hubber, P., Widjaja, W., & Aranda, G. (2022). Assessment of an interdisciplinary project in science and mathematics: Opportunities and challenges. Teaching Science, 68(1), 13-25. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1346068
Idris, S. H., Jawawi, R., Mahadi, M. A., Matzin, R., Shahrill, M., Jaidin, J. H., Petra, N. A., & Mundia, L. (2017). The use of rubrics in developing students’ understanding of history. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 901-904. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7432
Jonsson, A. (2010). The use of transparency in the ‘Interactive examination’ for student teachers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(2), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695941003694441
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
Kennedy, E., & Shiel, G. (2022). Writing assessment for communities of writers: Rubric validation to support formative assessment of writing in Pre-K to grade 2. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 29(2), 127-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2047608
Kim, J. (2019). Effects of rubric-referenced self-assessment training on Korean high school students’ English writing. English Teaching, 74(3), 79-111. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.74.3.201909.79
King, B., Raposo, D., & Gimenez, M. (2016). Promoting student buy-in: Using writing to develop mathematical understanding. Georgia Educational Researcher, 13(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.20429/ger.2016.130202
Liu, C. C., Lu, K. H., Wu, L. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). The impact of peer review on creative selfefficacy and learning performance in Web 2.0 learning activities. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2). 286-297. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.2.286
Mahmood, D., & Jacobo, H. (2019). Grading for growth: Using sliding scale rubrics to motivate struggling learners. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(2), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1844
McTighe, J., & Frontier, T. (2022). How to provide better feedback through rubrics. Educational Leadership, 79(7), 17-23.
Nsabayezu, E., Mukiza, J., Iyamuremye, A., Mukamanzi, O. U., & Mbonyiryivuze, A. (2022). Rubric-based formative assessment to support students’ learning of organic chemistry in the selected secondary schools in Rwanda: A technology-based learning. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 12251-12271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11113-5
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., Pinedo, L., & Fernández-Castilla, B. (2023). Effects of rubrics on academic performance, self-regulated learning, and self-efficacy: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 35, Article 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09823-4
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2016). Scaffolding self-regulated learning through self-assessment and peer assessment: Guidelines for classroom implementation. In D. Laveault, & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 311-326). Springer.
Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859
Safadi, R. (2017). Self-diagnosis as a tool for supporting students’ conceptual understanding and achievements in physics: The case of 8th-graders studying force and motion. Physics Education, 52(1), Article 14002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/52/1/014002
Safadi, R., & Saadi, S. (2021). Learning from self-diagnosis activities when contrasting students’ own solutions with worked examples: The case of 10th graders studying geometric optics. Research in Science Education, 51, 523-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9806-8
Smit, R., Bachmann, P., Blum, V., Birri, T., & Hess, K. (2017). Effects of a rubric for mathematical reasoning on teaching and learning in primary school. Instructional Science, 45(5), 603-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9416-2
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Susan M. Brookhart
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
a. Los autores mantienen los derechos de autor y conceden a la revista el derecho de primera publicación.
b. Todos los trabajos están licenciados bajo la Licencia Creative Commons Attribution, que permite compartir el trabajo con reconocimiento de la autoría.
Hasta 2024, Estudos em Avaliação Educacional adoptó la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial (CC BY-NC) para sus publicaciones. Para los textos publicados a partir de 2025, utilizará la licencia Creative Commons Atribución (CC BY), en consonancia con los principios de la Ciencia Abierta.
