Missing data in educational assessment: a comparison of data treatment methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18222/eae.v0ix.3916Keywords:
Treatment of Missing Data, Education Assessment, Academic Performance, Simulation.Abstract
Missing data are common in educational assessments. Using the appropriate methods has, therefore, become essential to reduce the impact of the loss of information. The present study aims to compare the performance of four methods for dealing with missing data (mean imputation, listwise deletion, maximum likelihood and multiple imputation), all based on regression models applied to the educational assessment of data collected in the State of Ceará. Information about 7,000 students was used, simulating various scenarios according to the percentage and the type of the missing data. The mean imputation method showed the worst performance in all simulated scenarios and the other methods showed similar results among themselves. Moreover, the use of auxiliary variables in the estimation by maximum likelihood and multiple imputation proved to reduce the bias of estimates of some important parameters of the model, when the simulated missing data is not random.
Downloads
References
BARALDI, Amanda N.; ENDERS, Craig K. An introduction to modern missing data analyses. Journal of School Psychology, Amsterdam, v. 48, p. 5-37, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.10.001
BUCK, S. F. A method of estimation of missing values in multivariate data suitable for use with an electronic computer. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, London, v. 22, n. 2, p. 302-306, 1960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1960.tb00375.x
CEARÁ. Secretaria da Educação. SPAECE – 2011. Matemática, 3º ano: ensino médio. Fortaleza: SEE, UFJF, 2011. p. 1-22. (Boletim Pedagógico, v. 3).
CHEEMA, Jehanzeb R. A review of missing data handling methods in education research. Review of Educational Research, Thousand Oaks, CA, v. 20, n. 10, p. 1-20, 2014.
COHEN, Jacob; COHEN, Patricia. Applied multiple regression and correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1985.
COLLINS, Linda M.; SCHAFER, Joseph L.; KAM, Chi-Ming. A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing-data procedures. Psychological Methods, Washington, v. 6, n. 4, p. 330-351, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.6.4.330
COX, Bradley E. et al. Working with missing data in higher education research: a primer and real world. The Review of Higher Education, Baltimore, v. 37, n. 3, p. 377-402, Spring 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2014.0026
CRONINGER, Robert G.; DOUGLAS, Karen M. Missing data and institutional research. In: UMBACH, P. D. (Ed.). Survey research: emerging issues of technology, policy, and analysis. San Francisco: Wiley Interscience Periodicals, 2005. p. 33-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.154
ENDERS, Craig K. The performance of the full information maximum likelihood estimator in multiple regression models with missing data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, Thousand Oaks, CA, v. 61, n. 5, p. 713-740, 2001a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640121971482
ENDERS, Craig K. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data. Psychological Methods, Washington, v. 6, n. 4, p. 352-370, 2001b. ENDERS, Craig K. Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.6.4.352
FITZMAURICE, Garret et al. Longitudinal data analysis. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420011579.pt1
GRAHAM, John W. Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, Palo Alto, CA, v. 60, p. 549-576, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530
GRAHAM, John W.; OLCHOWSKI, Allison E.; GILREATH, Tamika D. How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, Berlin, v. 8, p. 206-213, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9
LANGKAMP, Diane L.; LEHMAN, Amy; LEMESHOW, Stanley. Techniques for handling missing data in secondary analyses of large surveys. Academic Pediatrics, Amsterdam, v. 10, n. 3, p. 205-210, maio/jun. 2010.3031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2010.01.005
MACEDO, Glaucia Alves. Fatores associados ao rendimento escolar de alunos da 5ª série (2000): uma abordagem longitudinal do valor adicionado e da heterogeneidade. 2004. 212f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Demografia) – Faculdade de Ciências Econômicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2004.
MCKNIGHT, Patrick E. et al. Missing data: a gentle introduction. New York: Guilford Press, 2007.
OLIVEIRA, Pedro Rodrigues; BELLUZZO, Walter; PAZELLO, Elaine Toldo. The public–private test score gap in Brazil. Economics of Education Review, Amsterdam, v. 35, p. 120-133, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.04.003
PEUGH, James L.; ENDERS, Craig K. Missing data in educational research: a review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research, Thousand Oaks, CA, v. 74, n. 4, p. 525-556, Winter 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074004525
RODRIGUES, Clarissa Guimarães; RIOS-NETO, Eduardo Luiz Gonçalves; PINTO, Cristine Campos de Xavier. Diferenças intertemporais na média e distribuição do desempenho escolar no Brasil: o papel do nível socioeconômico, 1997-2005. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, Belo Horizonte, v. 28, n. 1, p. 5-36, jan./jun. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-30982011000100002
ROSE, Roderick A.; FRASER, Mark W. A simplified framework for using multiple imputation in social work research. Social Work Research, Oxford, v. 32, n. 3, p. 171-178, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/32.3.171
ROUSSEAU, Michel et al. Reporting missing data: a study of selected articles published from 2003-2007. Quality & Quantity, Berlin, v. 46, n. 5, p. 1393-1406, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9452-y
RUBIN, Donald B. Inference and missing data. Biometrika, Oxford, v. 63, n. 3, p. 581-592, 1976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/63.3.581
RUBIN, Donald B. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316696
SAVALEI, Victoria; BENTLER, Peter M. A two-stage approach to missing data: theory and application to auxiliary variables. Structural Equation Modeling, London, v. 16, n. 3, p. 477-497, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008238
SCHAFER, Joseph L.; GRAHAM, John W. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, Washington, v. 7, n. 2, p. 147-177, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.2.147
SOARES, José Francisco; ALVES, Maria Teresa Gonzaga. Desigualdades raciais no sistema brasileiro de educação básica. Educação e Pesquisa, São Paulo, v. 29, n. 1, p. 147-165, jan./jun. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-97022003000100011
VINHA, Luís Gustavo do Amaral. Estudos longitudinais e tratamento de dados ausentes em avaliações educacionais. 2016. 124f. Tese (Doutorado em Psicologia Social, do Trabalho e das Organizações) – Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2016.
WILKS, S. S. Moments and distributions of estimates of population parameters from fragmentary samples. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, New York, v. 3, p. 163-195, 1932. 312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177732885
XERXENEVSKY, Lauren Lewis. Programa Mais Educação: avaliação do impacto da educação integral no desempenho de alunos no Rio Grande do Sul. 2012. 143f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Economia do Desenvolvimento) – Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012.
YOUNG, Rebekah; JOHNSON, David. Methods for handling missing secondary respondent data. Journal of Marriage and Family, New Jersey, v. 75, n. 1, p. 221-234, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01021.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Luis Gustavo do Amaral Vinha, Jacob Arie Laros

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
a. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication.
b. All works are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the sharing of the paper with acknowledgment of authorship.
Until 2024, Estudos em Avaliação Educacional adopted the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) license for its publications. For texts published from 2025 onwards, the journal will adopt the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, in line with the principles of Open Science.





