Parallels
Keywords:
Social Representations, Habitus, Field, ScienceAbstract
This article proposes a cross-reading of two French authors, Serge Moscovici and Pierre Bourdieu. They have contributed greatly to introducing new concepts and new theories into the social sciences, in an attempt to identify possible complementarities that they, or even their most direct followers, have rarely examined. Particular emphasis is given to the themes introduced by the philosophy and sociology of science, on which both took positions potentially more convergent than divergent. Its integration will be all the more necessary as the acceleration of current scientific and technological output presents new challenges to social reflexivity.
Downloads
References
BAKHTIN, M. The dialogic imagination: four essays. Editado por M. Holquist. Traduçao de C. Emerion e M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.
BLOOR, D. Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1976.
BOURDIEU, P. La spécificité du champ scientifique et les conditions sociales du progre de la raison. Sociologie et Société, v. 7, n. 1, p. 91-118, 1975.
BOURDIEU, P. Une science qui dérange – Entretien avec Pierre Thuiller, La Recherche. In: BOURDIEU, P. Questions de Sociologie. Paris: Minuit, 1980.
BOURDIEU, P. Homo academicus. Paris: Minuit, 1984.
BOURDIEU, P. La noblesse d’État. Grandes écoles et esprit de corps. Paris: Minuit, 1989a.
BOURDIEU, P. O poder simbólico. Lisboa: Deifel, 1989b.
BOURDIEU, P. Méditations pascaliennes. Paris: Minuit, 1997
BOURDIEU, P. Science de la science et reflexivité. Paris: Minuit, 2001.
CALLON, M.; LATOUR, B. Unscrewing the big leviathan: how actors macrostructure quality and sociologists, help them to do so. In: KARIN, K. C.; AARON, C. (Ed.). Advances in social theory and methodology: toward in integration of micro and macro sociologies. Boston: Routledge & Keagan
Paul, 1981. p. 277-303.
CAMPOS, P. H. F.; LIMA, R. C. P. Capital simbólico y representaciones sociales: una aproximación para investigar el espacio escolar. Investigaciones en Psicología, Buenos Aires, v. 20, n. 1, p. 31-44, 2015.
CAMPOS, P. H. F.; LIMA, R. C. P. Social positions and groups: new approximations between Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology and social representation theory. Culture & Psychology, v. 23, p. 1-14, jul. 2016.
DAMÁSIO, A. Descartes’error: emotion reason and the human brain. Londres: Picador, 1994.
DELEUZE, G.; GUATTARI, F. Mille plateaux: capitalisme et schizophreinie. Paris: Minuit, 1980. Tomo 2.
DOISE, W. L’explication en psychologie sociale. Paris: PUF, 1982.
DOISE, W. Les représentations sociales: définition d’un concept. In: DOISE, W.; PALMONARI, A. (Dir.). L’Étude des representations sociales. Paris: Neuchatel, Delachaux et Niestlé, 1986. p. 81-94.
DOISE, W. Les représentations sociales. In: DUBOIS, N. (Dir.). Psychologie sociale et cognition. Paris: Dunod, 2005. p. 155-207.
ETZKOWITZ, H.; LEYDESDORFF, L. The triple hélix – university-industry-government relations: a laboratory for knowledge – based economic development. EASST Review, v. 14, n. 1, p. 14-19, 1995.
ETZKOWITZ, H.; LEYDESDORFF, L. The dynamics of innovation: from natural systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, n. 29, p. 109-123, 2000.
GIDDENS, A. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity, 1984.
GOULD, S. J. Punctuated equilibrium. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.
JESUINO, J. C. Ancrages. In: BUSCHINI, F.; KALAMPALIKIS, N. (Dir.). Penser la vie, le social, la nature. Mélanges en l’honneur de Serge Moscovici. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’homme, 2001. p. 277-291.
KANT, I. Crítica da razão pura. Traduçao de Manuela Pinto dos Santos e Alexandre Fradique Morujao da 1a ediçao (1781) e 2a ediçao (1787) de Kritik der Reinen Vernunft da ediçao crítica de Raymind Schmidt. Lisboa: Fundaçao Calouste Gulbenkian, 2001.
KAUFMANN, P. Kurt Lewin. Une théorie du champ dans les sciences de l´homme. Paris: J. Vrin, 1968.
KNORR-CETINA, K. The manufacture of knowledge. In essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Londres: Pergamon, 1981.
KUHN, T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
LAHIRE, B. La culture des individus. Dimensions culturelles et distinction de soi. Paris: La Découverte/Poche, 2004.
LATOUR, B. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
LATOUR, B.; WOOLGAR, S. Laboratory life: the reconstruction of scientific fields. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1979.
LEWIN, K. Field theory in social science. Edited by Dorwin Cartwright. London: Tavistock, 1952.
LIMA, R. C. P.; CAMPOS, P. H. F. Campo e grupo: aproximaçao conceitual entre Pierre Bourdieu e a teoria moscoviciana das representaçoes sociais. Educação e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, v. 41, n. 1, p. 63-77, jan./mar. 2015.
MARKOVA, I. Des themata de base des représentations sociales du sida. In: GARNIER, C. (Dir.). Les formes de la pensée sociale. Paris: PUF, 2000. p. 55-77.
MARKOVA, I. Dialogicality and social representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
MARTUCCELLI, D. Sociologies de la modernité: l’itinéraire du XX siecle. Paris: Gallimard, 1999.
MAUSS, M. Sociologie et anthropologie. Paris: PUF, 1950.
MEAD, G. H. Mind, self & society from the standpoint of social behaviorist. Edited and with introduction by Charles W. Morris. Chicago: The Chicago University Press, 1974. Trabalho original publicado em 1934.
MERTON, R. The sociology of science theoretical and empirical investigations. Edited and introduction by Norman Wittoren. Chicago: The Chicago University Press, 1973.
MOSCOVICI, S. Essai sur l’histoire humaine de la nature. Paris: Flammarion, 1968.
MOSCOVICI, S. La société contre nature. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1972a.
MOSCOVICI, S. Sociey and theory in social psychology. In: ISRAELS, J.; TAJFEL, H. T. (Ed.). The context of social psychology: a critical assessment. London: Academic, 1972b.
MOSCOVICI, S. Hommes domestiques et hommes sauvages. Paris: Union Générale d’Éditions, 1974.
MOSCOVICI, S. La psychanalyse, son image et son public. 2. ed. Paris: PUF, 1976a.
MOSCOVICI, S. Social influence and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976b.
MOSCOVICI, S. L’âge des foules. Paris: Fayard, 1981.
MOSCOVICI, S. Le domaine de la psychologie sociale. In: MOSCOVICI, S. (Ed). La psychologie sociale. Paris: PUF, 1984.
MOSCOVICI, S. Toward a social psychology of science. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, v. 23, n. 2, p. 343-374, 1993a.
MOSCOVICI, S. The return of the unconscious. Social Research, v. 60, n. 1, p. 39-94, 1993b.
MOSCOVICI, S. Le regard psychosocial. Entretien avec Birgitta Orfali. Hermès, n. 41, p. 17-24, 2005.
MOSCOVICI, S.; DOISE, W. Discussões e consenso: uma teoria geral das decisoes colectivas. Traduçao de Maria F. Jesuino. Lisboa: Livros Horizonte, 1991.
MOSCOVICI, S.; DOISE, W. Discussions et consensus: une théorie génerale des décisions collectives. Paris: PUF, 1992.
MOSCOVICI, S.; MARKOVA, I. Ideas and their development: a dialogue between Serge Moscovi and Ivana Markova. In: MOSCOVICI, S. Social representations: explorations in Social Psychology. (G. Duveen, Ed.). London: Polity, 2000. p. 224-286.
MOSCOVICI, S.; MARKOVA, I. The making of modern social psychology: the hidden theory of how in international social science was created. Cambridge: Polity, 2006.
MOSCOVICI, S.; VIGNAUX, G. Le concept de themata. In: GUIMELLI, C. (Ed.). Structures et transformations des representations sociales. Neuchatel: Delachaux et Niestlé, 1994. p. 25-72.
PEIRCE, C. S. Semiótica. Traduçao de J. Teixeira Coelho Neto. Sao Paulo: Perspectiva, 2010.
PIAGET, J. Épistemologie des sciences de l’homme. Paris: Galimmard, 1970.
PIAGET, J. L’équilibration des structures cognitives: probleme central du dévelopment. Paris: PUF, 1975.
POLANYI, M. The tacit dimension. London: Routledge, 1966.
REICHENBACH, H. Experience and prediction: in the analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938.
RUMMELHART, D. E.; MACCLELLAND, D. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge: MST, 1986.
SÁ, C. P. Sur le relations entre représentations sociales, pratiques socio-culturelles et comportement. Papers on Social Representations, v. 3, n. 1, 1994.
SHINN, T.; RAGOUET, P. Controverses sur la science: pour une sociologie transversaliste de l’activité scientifique. Paris: Raison d’Agir, 2005.
SIMMEL, G. La détermination quantitative de groupe. In: SIMEL, G. Sociologie. Études sur les formes de la socialization. Paris: PUF, 1999. p. 81-159. Trabalho original publicado em 1908.
SLOTERDIJK, P. Tu dois changer ta vie: de l’anthropotechnique. Traduction allemande Plivier Mannuci. Paris: Pluriel, 2011.
SOKAL, A.; BRICMONT, J. Intellectual impostures. London: Profile Books, 1998.
TAJFEL, H. Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
THOM, R. Les mathématiques “modernes”: une erreur pédagogique et philosophique. Pourquoi la mathématique? Paris: Union Générale de l’Édition, 1974. p. 57-88.
WILEY, N. O self semiótico. Traduçao de Luiz Paulo Romanet. Sao Paulo: Loyola, 1994.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Cadernos de Pesquisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the paper simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license that allows the sharing of the paper with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (for example publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their paper on-line (for example in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any moment before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published paper (See The Effect of Open Access).
