The curricular dimension is a component of the didactic knowledge of the content
Keywords:
Curriculum, Didactics, Teaching, PhisicsAbstract
We describe a case study focused on the knowledge of the curriculum of a high school physics teacher, two consecutive years on electric field teaching. We used three levels to characterize the knowledge of the curriculum: declarative, design and action. The characterization of the knowledge of the curriculum was doing from pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), through the content analysis as a technique. The results show a high traditional tendency in each of the levels considered. After the intervention, the level of design represents the biggest changes, where intermediate trend increases. These results show the importance of curriculum design of education, in the process of realization of the PCK.
Downloads
References
ABELL, S. K. Research on science teacher knowledge. In: ABELL, S.; LEDERMAN, N. (ed.). Handbook of research on science education. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007, p. 1105-1149.
BARDIN, L. El análisis de contenido. Madrid: Akal, 1986.
BAXTER, J. A.; LEDERMAN, N. G. Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In: GESS-NEWSOME, J.; LEDERMAN, N. G. Examining pedagogical content knowledge: the construct and its Implications for science education. Dordrecht: Springer, 1999. p. 147-161.
CHEUNG, D.; WONG, H. W. Measuring teacher beliefs about alternative curriculum designs. Curriculum journal, v. 13, n. 2, p. 225-248, 2002.
CONTRERAS, S. A. Qué piensan los profesores sobre sus clases: estudio sobre las creencias curriculares y las creencias de actuación curricular. Formación Universitaria, v. 1, n. 3, p. 3-11, 2008.
CONTRERAS, S. A. Creencias curriculares y creencias de actuación curricular de los profesores de ciencias chilenos. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, v. 8, n. 2, p. 505-526, 2009.
FRAENKEL, J.; WALLEN, N. How to design evaluate research in education. New York: Mc. GrawHill, 2009.
FRIEDRICHSEN, P. M.; DANA, T. M. Using a Card-Sorting Task to Elicit and Clarify Science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, v. 14, n. 4, p. 291-305, 2003.
FRIEDRICHSEN, P. M.; VAN DRIEL, J. H.; ABELL, S. K. Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, v. 95, n. 2, p. 358-376, 2011.
FRIEDRICHSEN, P. M.; ABELL, S. K.; PAREJA, E. M.; BROWN, P. L.; LANKFORD, D. M.; VOLKMANN, M. J. Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers’ prior knowledge for teaching in an Alternative Certification Program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 46, n. 4, p. 357-383, 2009.
HALIM, L.; MEERAH, S. M. Science trainee teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge and its Influence on physics teaching. Research in Science & Technological Education, v. 20, n. 2, p. 215-225, 2002.
HENZE, I.; VAN DRIEL, J. H.; VERLOOP, N. Development of experienced science teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of models of the solar system and the universe. International Journal of Science Education, v. 30, n. 10, p. 1321-1342, 2008.
JUSTI, R.; VAN DRIEL, J. The development of science teachers’ knowledge on models and modelling: promoting, characterizing, and understanding the process. International Journal of Science Education, v. 27, n. 5, p. 549-573, 2005.
KRATHWOHL, D. R. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory into practice, v. 41, n. 4, p. 212-218, 2002.
LEE, E.; LUFT, J. A. Experienced secondary science teachers’ representation of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, v. 30, n. 10, p. 1343-1363, 2008.
LOUGHRAN, J.; MULHALL, P.; BERRY, A. In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 41, n. 4, p. 370-391, 2004.
MAGNUSSON, S.; KRAJCIK, L.; BORKO, H. Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In: GESS-NEWSOME, J.; LEDERMAN, N. G. (ed.). Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 1999. p. 95-132.
MELLADO, V. ¿Por qué a los profesores de ciencias nos cuesta tanto cambiar nuestras concepciones y modelos didácticos? Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, n. 40, p. 17-30, 2001.
MELLADO, V.; BORRACHERO, A. B.; BRÍGIDO, M.; MELO, L.V.; DÁVILA, M. A.; CAÑADA, F.; CONDE, M. C.; COSTILLO, E.; CUBERO, J.; ESTEBAN, R.; MARTÍNEZ, G.; RUIZ, C.; SÁNCHEZ, J.; GARRITZ, A.; MELLADO, L.; VÁZQUEZ, B.; JIMÉNEZ, R.; BERMEJO, M. L. Las emociones en la enseñanza de las ciencias. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, v. 32, n. 3, p. 11-36, 2014.
MELO, L.; CARDONA, G.; CAÑADA, F.; MARTÍNEZ, G. Conocimiento didáctico del contenido sobre el principio de Arquímedes en un programa de formación de profesores de física en Colombia. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, v. 23, n. 76, p. 253-279, 2018.
ORLEANS, A. V. Enhancing teacher competence through online training. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, v. 19, n. 3, p. 371-386, 2010.
PARK, S.; CHEN, Y.-C. Mapping out the integration of the components of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 49, n. 7, p. 922-941, 2012.
PARK, S.; OLIVER, J. S. Revisiting the conceptualisation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, v. 38, n. 3, p. 261-284, 2008.
PRO, A. Planificación de unidades didácticas por los profesores: análisis de tipos de actividades de enseñanza. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, v. 3, n. 17, p. 411-429, 1998.
REYES, J.; MARTÍNEZ, C. A. Conocimiento didáctico del contenido en la enseñanza del campo eléctrico. Tecné Episteme y Didaxis, TED, n. 33, p. 36-60, 2013.
SADLER, P. M.; SONNERT, G.; COYLE, H. P.; COOK-SMITH, N.; MILLER, J. L. The influence of teachers’ knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, v. 50, n. 5, p. 1020-1049, 2013.
SCHNEIDER, R. M.; PLASMAN. K. Science teacher learning progressions: a review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of Educational Research, v. 81, n. 4, p. 530-565, 2011.
SEUNG, E. The process of physics teaching Assistants’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, v. 11, n. 6, p. 1303-1326, 2013.
SHULMAN, L. Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, v. 15, n. 2, p. 4-14, 1986.
SOLÍS, E.; PORLÁN, R.; RIVERO, A. ¿Cómo representar el conocimiento curricular de los profesores de ciencias y su evolución? Enseñanza de las Ciencias, v. 30, n. 3, p. 9-30, 2012.
STENHOUSE, L. Investigación y desarrollo del currículum. Madrid: Morata, 1984.
VARELA, P.; PÉREZ, M. C.; MANRIQUE, M. Electricidad y magnetismo. Madrid: Síntesis Educación, 2000.
VÁZQUEZ-BERNAL, B.; JIMÉNEZ, R.; MELLADO, V. Los obstáculos para el desarrollo profesional de una profesora de enseñanza secundaria en ciencias experimentales. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, v. 28, n. 3, p. 417-432, 2010.
VÁZQUEZ-BERNAL, B.; JIMÉNEZ, R.; MELLADO, V. El conocimiento didáctico del contenido (CDC) de una profesora de ciencias: reflexión y acción como facilitadores del aprendizaje. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, v. 37, n. 1, p. 25-53, 2019.
VÁZQUEZ-BERNAL, B.; JIMENEZ PEREZ, R.; MELLADO, V.; TABOADA LEÑERO, M. C. The process of change in science teachers’ professional development: a case study based on the types of problems in the classroom. Science Education, v. 96, n. 2, p. 337-363, 2012.
VERDUGO-PERONA, J.; SOLAZ-PORTOLÉS, J.; SANJOSÉ-LÓPEZ, V. El conocimiento didáctico del contenido
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos de Pesquisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the paper simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license that allows the sharing of the paper with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (for example publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their paper on-line (for example in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any moment before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published paper (See The Effect of Open Access).
