Learning processes and learning assessment for expertise development

Authors

  • Gustavo Danicki Aureliano Rosa Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Educação da Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB), Brasília-DF, Brasil
  • Afonso Celso Tanus Galvão Instituto Expert Brasil e Escola Lacaniana de Brasília, Brasília-DF, Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18222/eae.v29i71.4265

Keywords:

Educational Assessment, Taxonomy, Problem Solving, Cognitive Development

Abstract

An analysis of verbal protocols of learning processes, and their categorization based on Bloom’s et al. (1977) taxonomy of educational objectives, is developed to generate subsidies for an educational assessment of learning processes. The participants were six academics who were observed while solving problems involving domain and non-domain material. Results suggest that: i) knowledge that is relevant for the realignment of actions in situations of teaching, such as keywords that are meaningful for individuals that can be obtained even when inserted into nondomain materials; and ii) categorizations such as the ones proposed for this study can contribute to the effectiveness of students’ learning processes in situations that are appropriate for their level of development and towards the mastery of study content.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Gustavo Danicki Aureliano Rosa, Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Educação da Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB), Brasília-DF, Brasil

Doutorando em Educação (Universidade Católica de Brasília), Mestre em Educação (Universidade Católica de Brasília), Especialista em Educação Continuada (Universidade de Brasília) e Graduado em Pedagogia (Universidade de Brasília).

Afonso Celso Tanus Galvão, Instituto Expert Brasil e Escola Lacaniana de Brasília, Brasília-DF, Brasil

Doutor em Psicologia Educacional (University of Reading, Inglaterra). Mestre em Educação (University of Reading, Inglaterra). Graduado em Música (Universidade de Brasília) e Psicologia (The Open University, Inglaterra). Atua como Professor no Programa de Pós-graduação Stricto Sensu da Universidade Católica de Brasília.

References

ANDERSON, J. R. Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, Washington, DC, v. 89, n. 4, p. 369-406, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.89.4.369

ANDERSON, J. R. ACT: a simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, Washington, DC, v. 51, n. 4, p. 355-365, Apr. 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.51.4.355

ANDERSON, J. R. How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? New York: Oxford University, 2010.

ANDERSON, J. R. et al. Cognitive modeling and intelligent tutoring. Artificial Intelligence, Amsterdam, v. 42, n. 1, p. 7-49, Feb. 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(90)90093-F

BLOOM, B. S. et al. Taxonomia de objetivos educacionais. 6. ed. Porto Alegre: Globo, 1977.

BRUER, J. T. Schools for thought: a science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge: MIT, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6052.001.0001

BUCHANAN, B. G.; DAVIS, R.; FEINGENBAUM, E. A. Expert systems: a perspective from computer science. In: ERICSSON, K. A. et al. (Ed.). Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University, 2006. p. 87-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.006

CHI, M. T. H. Methods to assess the representations of experts and novices knowledge. In: ERICSSON, K. A. et al. (Ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York: Cambridge University, 2006. p. 167-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.010

CURY, H. N. Análise de erros: o que podemos aprender com as respostas dos alunos. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2007.

ERICSSON, K. A. Protocol analysis and expert thought: concurrent verbalizations of thinking during experts performance on representative tasks. In: ERICSSON, K. A. et al. (Ed.). Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York: Cambridge University, 2006a. p. 223-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.013

ERICSSON, K. A. The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In: ERICSSON, K. A. et al. (Ed.). Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York: Cambridge University, 2006b, p. 683-704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.038

ERICSSON, K. A. Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated from studies of performance in the general population: a response to criticisms. Intelligence, Amsterdam, v. 45, p. 81-103, July/Aug. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.12.001

ERICSSON, K. A.; SIMON, H. A. Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, Washington, DC, v. 87, n. 3, p. 215-251, May 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.87.3.215

GALVÃO, A. C. T. Pesquisa sobre expertise: perspectivas e limitações. Temas em Psicologia da SBP, Ribeirão Preto, v. 9, n. 3, p. 223-237, 2001.

GATTI, B. A. O professor e a avaliação em sala de aula. Estudos em Avaliação Educacional, São Paulo, n. 27, p. 97-114, jan./jun. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18222/eae02720032179

GATTI, B. A. Formação de professores para o ensino fundamental: estudo de currículos das licenciaturas em pedagogia, língua portuguesa, matemática e ciências biológicas. São Paulo: FCC/DPE, 2009.

GOBET, F.; SIMON, H. A. Expert chess memory: revisiting the chunking hypothesis. Memory, v. 6, n. 3, p. 225-255, June 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/741942359

HAYDT, R. C. C. Curso de didática geral. São Paulo: Ática, 2006.

KALYUGA, S. et al. The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, London, v. 38, n. 1, p. 23-31, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4

LEITE, S. A. da S.; KAGER, S. Efeitos aversivos das práticas de avaliação da aprendizagem escolar. Ensaio: Avaliação de Políticas Públicas em Educação, Rio de Janeiro, v. 17, n. 62, p. 109-134, jan./mar. 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362009000100006

MORTARI, C. A. Introdução à lógica. São Paulo: Unesp, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7476/9788539303199

PLASS, J. P.; KALYUGA, S.; LEUTNER, D. Individual differences and cognitive load theory. In: PLASS, J. P.; MORENO, R.; BRÜNKEN, R. (Ed.). Cognitive load theory. New York: Cambridge University, 2010. p. 65-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.006

SEVERINO, A. J. Metodologia do trabalho científico. 21. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2000.

SIMON, H. A. Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, Palo Alto, CA, v. 41, p. 1-19, Feb. 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.41.1.1

TYLER, R. W. Princípios básicos de currículo e ensino. São Paulo: Globo, 1974.

VIANNA, H. M. Introdução à avaliação educacional. São Paulo: Ibrasa, 1989.

ZIMMERMAN, B. J. Development and adaptation of expertise: the role of self-regulatory processes and beliefs. In: ERICSSON, K. A. et al. (Ed.). Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York: Cambridge University, 2006. p. 705-722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.039

Downloads

Published

2018-08-31

How to Cite

Rosa, G. D. A., & Galvão, A. C. T. (2018). Learning processes and learning assessment for expertise development. Estudos Em Avaliação Educacional, 29(71), 386–412. https://doi.org/10.18222/eae.v29i71.4265

Issue

Vol. 29 No. 71 (2018): maio/ago. 2018

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Gustavo Danicki Aureliano Rosa, Afonso Celso Tanus Galvão

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

a. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication.

b. All works are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the sharing of the paper with acknowledgment of authorship.

Until 2024, Estudos em Avaliação Educacional adopted the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) license for its publications. For texts published from 2025 onwards, the journal will adopt the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, in line with the principles of Open Science.