Learning processes and learning assessment for expertise development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18222/eae.v29i71.4265Keywords:
Educational Assessment, Taxonomy, Problem Solving, Cognitive DevelopmentAbstract
An analysis of verbal protocols of learning processes, and their categorization based on Bloom’s et al. (1977) taxonomy of educational objectives, is developed to generate subsidies for an educational assessment of learning processes. The participants were six academics who were observed while solving problems involving domain and non-domain material. Results suggest that: i) knowledge that is relevant for the realignment of actions in situations of teaching, such as keywords that are meaningful for individuals that can be obtained even when inserted into nondomain materials; and ii) categorizations such as the ones proposed for this study can contribute to the effectiveness of students’ learning processes in situations that are appropriate for their level of development and towards the mastery of study content.
Downloads
References
ANDERSON, J. R. Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, Washington, DC, v. 89, n. 4, p. 369-406, 1982.
ANDERSON, J. R. ACT: a simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, Washington, DC, v. 51, n. 4, p. 355-365, Apr. 1996.
ANDERSON, J. R. How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? New York: Oxford University, 2010.
ANDERSON, J. R. et al. Cognitive modeling and intelligent tutoring. Artificial Intelligence, Amsterdam, v. 42, n. 1, p. 7-49, Feb. 1990.
BLOOM, B. S. et al. Taxonomia de objetivos educacionais. 6. ed. Porto Alegre: Globo, 1977.
BRUER, J. T. Schools for thought: a science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge: MIT, 1993.
BUCHANAN, B. G.; DAVIS, R.; FEINGENBAUM, E. A. Expert systems: a perspective from computer science. In: ERICSSON, K. A. et al. (Ed.). Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University, 2006. p. 87-104.
CHI, M. T. H. Methods to assess the representations of experts and novices knowledge. In: ERICSSON, K. A. et al. (Ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York: Cambridge University, 2006. p. 167-184.
CURY, H. N. Análise de erros: o que podemos aprender com as respostas dos alunos. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2007.
ERICSSON, K. A. Protocol analysis and expert thought: concurrent verbalizations of thinking during experts performance on representative tasks. In: ERICSSON, K. A. et al. (Ed.). Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York: Cambridge University, 2006a. p. 223-242.
ERICSSON, K. A. The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In: ERICSSON, K. A. et al. (Ed.). Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York: Cambridge University, 2006b, p. 683-704.
ERICSSON, K. A. Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated from studies of performance in the general population: a response to criticisms. Intelligence, Amsterdam, v. 45, p. 81-103, July/Aug. 2014.
ERICSSON, K. A.; SIMON, H. A. Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, Washington, DC, v. 87, n. 3, p. 215-251, May 1980.
GALVÃO, A. C. T. Pesquisa sobre expertise: perspectivas e limitações. Temas em Psicologia da SBP, Ribeirão Preto, v. 9, n. 3, p. 223-237, 2001.
GATTI, B. A. O professor e a avaliação em sala de aula. Estudos em Avaliação Educacional, São Paulo, n. 27, p. 97-114, jan./jun. 2003.
GATTI, B. A. Formação de professores para o ensino fundamental: estudo de currículos das licenciaturas em pedagogia, língua portuguesa, matemática e ciências biológicas. São Paulo: FCC/DPE, 2009.
GOBET, F.; SIMON, H. A. Expert chess memory: revisiting the chunking hypothesis. Memory, v. 6, n. 3, p. 225-255, June 1998.
HAYDT, R. C. C. Curso de didática geral. São Paulo: Ática, 2006.
KALYUGA, S. et al. The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, London, v. 38, n. 1, p. 23-31, 2003.
LEITE, S. A. da S.; KAGER, S. Efeitos aversivos das práticas de avaliação da aprendizagem escolar. Ensaio: Avaliação de Políticas Públicas em Educação, Rio de Janeiro, v. 17, n. 62, p. 109-134, jan./mar. 2009.
MORTARI, C. A. Introdução à lógica. São Paulo: Unesp, 2001.
PLASS, J. P.; KALYUGA, S.; LEUTNER, D. Individual differences and cognitive load theory. In: PLASS, J. P.; MORENO, R.; BRÜNKEN, R. (Ed.). Cognitive load theory. New York: Cambridge University, 2010. p. 65-91.
SEVERINO, A. J. Metodologia do trabalho científico. 21. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2000.
SIMON, H. A. Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, Palo Alto, CA, v. 41, p. 1-19, Feb. 1990.
TYLER, R. W. Princípios básicos de currículo e ensino. São Paulo: Globo, 1974.
VIANNA, H. M. Introdução à avaliação educacional. São Paulo: Ibrasa, 1989.
ZIMMERMAN, B. J. Development and adaptation of expertise: the role of self-regulatory processes and beliefs. In: ERICSSON, K. A. et al. (Ed.). Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York: Cambridge University, 2006. p. 705-722.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Estudos em Avaliação Educacional

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the paper simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) license that allows the sharing of the paper with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (for example publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their paper on-line (for example in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any moment before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published paper (See The Effect of Open Access).