Curriculum ideologies and conceptions of diversity and social justice
Keywords:
Teacher Education, Curriculum, Ideology, Social JusticeAbstract
In this study, we aimed to identify the curriculum ideologies of preservice teachers and the relationship between those and their conceptions of diversity and social justice. Data were obtained from the application of the inventory of curriculum ideologies to 231 participants and semi-structured interviews to a purposeful sample of participants in a Chilean university. Results showed that the Learner Centered Ideology was predominant and that a significant number of participants showed ideological eclecticism. Despite the focus on learning, some defend Scholar Academic and Social Efficiency arguments. Moreover, there is a gradual relationship between ideologies and conceptions of diversity and justice, varying from a marked coherence to total absence of relationship. Finally, implications for research and initial teacher education are discussed.
Downloads
References
APPLE, Michael. Ideology and curriculum. 4. ed. New York: Routledge, 2019.
BANKS, James; BANKS, Cherry. Multicultural education: issues and perspectives. 9. ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 2016.
BELAVI, Guillermina; MURILLO, Francisco Javier. Educación, democracia y justicia social. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social, Madrid, v. 5, n. 1, p. 13-34, jun. 2016.
BENNET, Christine. Genres of research in multicultural education. Review of Educational Research, v. 71, n. 2, p. 171-217, 2001. DOI: 10.3102/00346543071002171
BOBBITT, Franklin. The curriculum. United States: Nabu, 1918.
CARLISLE, Lenore Reilly; JACKSON, Bailey; GEORGE, Alison. Principles of social justice education: the social justice education in school’s project. Equity & Excellence in Education, Massachusetts, v. 39, n. 1, p. 55-64, Feb. 2006. DOI: 10.1080/10665680500478809
COCHRAN-SMITH, Marilyn; SHAKMAN, Karen; JONG, Cindy; TERRELL, Dianna; BARNATT, Joan; MCQUILLAN, Patrick. Good and just teaching: the case for social justice in teacher education. American Journal of Education, Chicago, v. 115, n. 3, p. 347-377, May 2009.
CRAHAY, M. Groupe Européen de Recherche sur l’Équité des Systèmes Educatifs. L’équité des systèmes éducatifs européens: un ensemble d’indicateurs. 2003. Disponible en: http://afecinfo.free.fr/afec/documents/Indicateurs_equite.pdf. Acceso en: 20 dic. 2019.
CRESWELL, John. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 4. ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2014.
DÍAZ BARRIGA, Frida. Aproximaciones metodológicas al diseño curricular hacia una propuesta integral. Tecnología y Comunicación Educativas, México, n. 21, p. 19-39, 1993.
FERNÁNDEZ, María Paz. Mapa del estudiantado extranjero en el sistema escolar chileno (2015-2017). Santiago de Chile: Centro de Estudios Ministerio de Educación, 2018.
FLICK, Uwe. Introducing research methodology: a beginner’s guide to doing a research project. Los Angeles: Sage, 2015.
FRASER, Nancy. La justicia social en la era de la política de la identidad: redistribución, reconocimiento y participación. In: HONNETH, A.; FRASER, N. ¿Redistribución o reconocimiento? Un debate político-filosófico. Madrid: Morata, 2006. p. 13-88.
GAY, Geneva. Culturally responsive teaching: theory, research, and practice. 3. ed. New York: Teachers College, 2018.
GIMENO, José; FERNÁNDEZ, Mariano; TORRES, Jurjo; RODRÍGUEZ, Carmen; GONZÁLEZ, Miguel; PÉREZ, Justa. Saberes e incertidumbres sobre el currículum. Madrid: Morata, 2010.
HONNETH, Alex. Reconocimiento y justicia social. In: HONNETH, A.; FRASER, N. ¿Redistribución o reconocimiento?Un debate político-filosófico. Madrid: Morata, 2006. p. 126-148.
JIMÉNEZ-VARGAS, Felipe; MONTECINOS-SANHUEZA, Carmen. Polifonía en educación multicultural: enfoques académicos sobre diversidad y escuela. Magis, Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, Bogotá, v. 12, n. 24, p. 105-128, mar. 2019. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.m12-24.peme
KEMMIS, Stephen; FITZCLARENCE, Lindsay; MANZANO, Pablo. El curriculum: más allá de la teoría de la reproducción. 4. ed. Madrid: Morata, 2008.
KVALE, Steinar. Las entrevistas en investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Morata, 2011.
LADSON-BILLINGS, Gloria. Culturally relevant teaching. In: LADSON-BILLINGS, Gloria. The dreamkeepers: successful teachers of African American children. 2. ed. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 2009. p. 102-126.
MERRIAM, Sharan. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009.
MURILLO, Francisco Javier; HERNÁNDEZ-CASTILLA, Reyes. Hacia un concepto de justicia social. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, Madrid, v. 9, n. 4, p. 7-23, oct. 2011.
NIETO, Sonia. Affirming diversity: the sociopolitical context of multicultural education. 4. ed. New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon, 2004.
PARIS, Django. Culturally sustaining pedagogy: a needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, California, v. 41, n. 3, p. 93-97, Apr. 2012. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
PARIS, Django; ALIM, H. Samy. Culturally sustaining pedagogies: teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. New York: Teachers College, 2017.
PEÑA-SANDOVAL, César. The remix of culturally relevant pedagogy: pertinence, possibilities, and adaptations for the Chilean context. Perspectiva Educacional, v. 56, n. 1, p. 109-126, 2017. DOI: 10.4151/07189729-Vol.56-Iss.1-Art.462
PEÑA-SANDOVAL, César. Advancing culturally relevant pedagogy in teacher education from a Chilean perspective: a multi-case study of secondary preservice teachers. Multicultural Education Review, South Korea, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1-19, Jan. 2019. DOI: 10.1080/2005615X.2019.1567093
PEÑA-SANDOVAL, César; MONTECINOS, Carmen. Formación inicial docente desde una perspectiva de justicia social: una aproximación teórica. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social, Madrid, v. 5, n. 2, p. 71-86, nov. 2016.
PROGRAMA DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS PARA EL DESARROLLO (PNUD). Desiguales: orígenes, cambios y desafíos de la brecha social en Chile. Santiago de Chile: Uqbar, 2017.
RUIZ-OLABUÉNAGA, José Ignacio. Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto, 2012.
SANZ CABRERA, Teresa. El curriculum: su conceptualización. In: GONZÁLEZ PÉREZ, M.; HERNÁNDEZ DÍAZ, A.; HERNÁNDEZ FERNÁNDEZ, H.; SANZ CABRERA, T. Currículo y formación profesional: Instituto Superior Politécnico “José Antonio Echeverría”. Habana: Editorial Universitaria, 2003. p. 125-136.
SCHIRO, Michael. Curriculum theory: conflicting visions and enduring concerns. 2. ed. Los Angeles: Sage, 2013.
SLEETER, Christine; GRANT, Carl. Educación que es multicultural y reconstructivista social. In: WILLIAMSON, G.; MONTECINOS, C. (ed.). Educación multicultural: práctica de la equidad y diversidad para un mundo que demanda esperanza. Temuco: Universidad de La Frontera, 2011. p. 43-72.
SLEETER, Christine; MONTECINOS, Carmen; JIMÉNEZ, Felipe. Preparing teachers for social justice in the context of education policies that deepen class segregation in schools: the case of Chile. In: LAMPERT, J.; BURNETT, B. (ed.). Teacher education for high poverty schools. Switzerland: Springer, Cham, 2016. p. 171-191.
STAKE, Robert. E. Multicase research methods: step by step cross-case analysis. New York: Guilford, 2005.
STENHOUSE, Lawrence. Investigación y desarrollo del currículum. Madrid: Morata, 1984.
STRAUSS, Anselm; CORBIN, Juliet. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2. ed. London: Sage, 1998.
TYLER, Ralph. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
VENEGAS, Cristián. Hacia la innovación en la formación inicial docente para un desempeño exitoso en contextos alta vulnerabilidad social y educativa. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, Concepción, v. 12, n. 23, p. 47-59, ene./jul. 2013.
ZEICHNER, Kenneth M. Struggle for the soul of teacher education. New York: Routledge, 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos de Pesquisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the paper simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license that allows the sharing of the paper with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (for example publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their paper on-line (for example in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any moment before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published paper (See The Effect of Open Access).
