Gender inequality in Spanish medical research: A paradigmatic case
Keywords:
Research, Gender Inequality, Medical Sciences, UniversityAbstract
In order to assess gender inequality in medical scientific research, the institutional research databases of the University of Valencia (2000-2018), of the schools of health sciences (Medicine and Dentistry, Pharmacy, Nursing and Physiotherapy) are analyzed, considering sex, academic category, age and clinical specialty of the researchers. Male academics are responsible for an overwhelming number of research projects and contracts, also of a much higher amount, than those led by their female colleagues. The study also reveals horizontal segregation and a significant gender pay gap, highlighting the need for policies that optimize the talent and work of Spanish medical women scientists for the benefit of society.
Downloads
References
Alloza Frutos, M., Anghel, B., Sánchez de Madariaga, I., Rica, S. de la, & Dolado, J. J. (Coords.). (2012). White paper on the situation of women in science in Spain. Ministry of Science and Innovation. http://www. ciencia.gob.es/stfls/MICINN/Ministerio/FICHEROS/UMYC/WhitePaper_Interactive.pdf
Astegiano, J., Sebastián-González E., & Castanho, C. T. (2019). Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: A meta-analytical review. Royal Society Open Science, 6(6), Article e181566. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181566
Bates, C., Gordon, L. K., Travis, E., Chatterjee, A., Chaudron, L., Fivush, B., Gulati, M., Jagsi, R., Sharma, P., Gillis, M., Ganetzky, R., Grover, A., Lautenberger, D., & Moses, A. (2016). Striving for gender equity in academic medicine careers: A call to action. Academic Medicine, 91(8), 1050-1052. http:// doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001283
Besselaar, P. van de, & Sandstrom, U. (2016). Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: A longitudinal case study. Scientometrics, 106, 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1775-3
Bowen, C. J., Kersbergen, C. J., Tang, O., Cox, A., & Beach, M. C. (2018). Medical school research ranking is associated with gender inequality in MSTP application rates. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 187. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1306-z
Buckley, L. M., Sanders, K., Shih, M., & Hampton, C. L. (2000). Attitudes of clinical faculty about career progress, career success and recognition, and commitment to academic medicine: Results of a survey. Archives of Internal Medicine, 160(17), 2625-2629. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.17.2625
Butkus, R., Serchen, J., Moyer, D. V., Bornstein, S. S., & Hingle, S. T. (2018). Achieving gender equity in physician compensation and career advancement: A position paper of the American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine, 168(10), 721-723. https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-3438
Carr, P. L., Raj, A., Kaplan, S. E., Terrin, N., Breeze, J. L., & Freund, K. M. (2018). Gender differences in academic medicine: Retention, rank, and leadership comparisons from the national faculty survey. Academic Medicine, 93(11), 1694-1699. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002146
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(8), 3157-3162. https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1014871108
Connolly, S., & Holdcroft, A. (2009). The pay gap for women in medicine and academic medicine: An analysis of the WAM* database. British Medical Association. https://www.medicalwomensfederation.org.uk/ images/Daonload_Pay_Gap_Report.pdf
Escolano, E. (2006). Entre la discriminación y el mérito: Las profesoras en las universidades valencianas. Publicaciones de la Universidad de Valencia.
European Commission. (2019). She figures 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/she-figures-2018_en.
European Institute for Gender Equality. (2016). Promoting gender equality in academia and research institutions. https://eige.europa.eu/publications/promoting-gender-equality-academia-and-research-institutions-main-findings.
European Institute for Gender Equality. (2019a). Gender Equality Index 2019. https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2019
European Institute for Gender Equality. (2019b). Tackling the gender pay gap: Not without a better work-life balance. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://eige.europa.eu/publications/ tackling-gender-pay-gap-not-without-better-work-life-balance
European Union. (2012). Meta-analysis of gender and science research. https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/ pub_gender_equality/meta-analysis-of-gender-and-science-research-synthesis-report.pdf
Eurostat (2019). Database Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/browse-statistics-by-theme
Fox, M. F., Fonseca, C., & Bao, J. (2011). Work and family conflict in academic science: Patterns and predictors among women and men in research universities. Social Studies of Science, 41(5), 715-735.
Lee, R. van de, & Ellemers, N. (2015). Gender contributes to personal research funding success in the Netherlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 112, 12349-12353. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.1510159112
Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262-265. https://science.sciencemag.org/ content/347/6219/262
Mauleón, E., Hillán, L., Moreno, L., Gómez, I., & Bordons, M. (2013). Assessing gender balance among journal authors and editorial board members. Scientometrics, 95(1), 87-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-012-0824-4
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (2018a). Científicas en cifras 2017. Estadísticas e indicadores de la (des)igualdad de género en la formación y profesión científica. http://www.ciencia.gob.es/stfls/ MICINN/Ministerio/FICHEROS/UMYC/Cientificas_cifras_2017.pdf
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (2018b). Sistema Integrado de Información Universitaria. https://www.ciencia.gob.es/portal/site
Monroe, A. K., Levine, R. B., Clark, J. M., Bickel, J., MacDonald, S. M., & Resar, L. M. S. (2015). Through a gender lens: A view of gender and leadership positions in a department of medicine. Journal of Women's Health (Larchmt), 24(10), 837-842. http://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2014.5054
Ovseiko, P. V., Greenhalgh, T., Adam, P., Grant, J., Hinrichs-Krapels, S., Graham, K. E., Valentine P. A., Sued O., Boukhris, O. F., Olaqi, N. M. Al, Rahbi, I. S. Al, Dowd, A-M., Bice, S., Heiden, T. L., Fischer, M. D., Dopson, S., Norton, R., Pollitt, A., Wooding, S., ... Buchan, A. M. (2016). A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment. Health Research Policy and Systems, 14(1), 50. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0126-z
Pattani, R., Marquez, C., Dinyarian, C., Sharma, M., Bain, J., Moore, J. E., & Straus, S. E. (2018). The perceived organizational impact of the gender gap across a Canadian department of medicine and proposed strategies to combat it: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 48. https://doi. org/10.1186/s12916-018-1032-8.
Paulus, J. K., Switkowski, K. M., Allison, G. M., Connors, M., Buchsbaum, R. J., Freund, K. M., & Blazey- -Martin, D. (2016). Where is the leak in the pipeline? Investigating gender differences in academic promotion at an academic medical centre. Perspectives on Medical Education, 5(2), 125-128. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0263-7
Pingleton, S. K., Jones, V. M., Rosolowski, T. A., & Zimmerman, M. K. (2016). Silent bias: Challenges, obstacles, and strategies for leadership development in academic medicine- Lessons from oral histories of women professors at the University of Kansas. Academic Medicine, 91(8), 1151-1157. https://doi. org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001125
Plank-Bazinet, J. L., Bunker Whittington, K., Cassidy, S. K., Filart, R., Cornelison, T. L., Begg, L., & Austin Clayton J. (2016). Programmatic efforts at the National Institutes of Health to promote and support the careers of women in biomedical science. Academic Medicine, 91(8), 1057-1064. https://doi. org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001239
Raj, A., Carr, P. L., Kaplan, S. E., Terrin, N., Breeze, J. L., & Freund, K. M. (2016). Longitudinal Analysis of Gender Differences in Academic Productivity among Medical Faculty across 24 Medical Schools in the United States. Academic Medicine, 91(8), 1074-1079. https://doi.org/10.1097/ ACM.0000000000001251
Red de Unidades de Igualdad de Género por la Excelencia Universitaria. (n.d.). La xarxa d'unitats d' igualtat de gènere per a l'excel·lència universitària. https://www.uv.es/ruigeu/ca/xarxa/es-red.html
Regulation (EU) no 1291/2013. (2013, 20 December). Of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) and repealing Decision No 1982/2006/EC. (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/legal_basis/fp/ h2020-eu-establact_en.pdf
Rochon, P. A., Davidoff, F., & Levinson, W. (2016). Women in academic medicine leadership: Has anything changed in 25 years? Academic Medicine, 91(8), 1053-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ ACM.0000000000001281
Shannon, G., Jansen, M., Williams, K., Cáceres, C., Motta, A., Odhiambo, A., Eleveld, A., & Mannell, J. (2019). Gender equality in science, medicine, and global health: Where are we and why does it matter? Lancet, 393(10171), 560-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33135-0
Shen, H. (2013). Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap. Despite improvements, female scientists continue to face discrimination, unequal pay and funding disparities. Nature, 495(7439), 22-24. https://doi. org/10.1038/495022a
Universidad de Valencia. (n.d.). Recull de Dades Estadístiques de la UV. https://www.uv.es/reculldedades
Waisbren, S. E., Bowles, H., Hasan, T., Zou, K. H., Emans, S. J., Goldberg, C., Gould, S., Levine, D., Lieberman, E., Loeken, M., Longtine, J., Nadelson, C., Patenaude, A. F., Quinn, D., Randolph, A. G., Solet, J. M., Ullrich, N., Walensky, R., Weitzman, P., & Christou, H. (2008). Gender differences in research Grant applications and funding outcomes for medical school faculty. Journal of Women's Health, 17(2), 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2007.0412
Wenneras, C., & Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature, 387(6631), 341-343. https:// doi.org/10.1038/387341a0
Westring, A., McDonald, J. M., Carr, P., & Grisso, J. A. (2016). An integrated framework for gender equity in academic medicine. Academic Medicine, 91(8), 1041-1044. https://doi.org/10.1097/ ACM.0000000000001275
Yedidia, M. J., & Bickel, J. (2001). Why aren’t there more women leaders in academic medicine? The views of clinical department chairs. Academic Medicine, 76(5), 453-465. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888- 200105000-00017
Zuckerman, H. (2001). The careers of men and women scientists: Gender differences in career attainment. In Wyer M. (Ed.), Women, science and technology: A reader in feminist science studies (pp. 69-78). Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Cadernos de Pesquisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the paper simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license that allows the sharing of the paper with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (for example publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their paper on-line (for example in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any moment before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published paper (See The Effect of Open Access).
