Culture scientifique en sciences humaines: vers a dialogue
Mots-clés :
Culture Scientifique, Sciences Humanines, Éducation de BaseRésumé
L’article vise à discuter et à problématiser la proximité entre la notion de culture scientifique et l’enseignement scolaire des sciences humaines. Il présente les résultats de l’analyse de 32 articles afin d’en extraire les principales contributions, principes, défis et suggestions susceptibles de favoriser le dialogue entre la culture scientifique et les sciences humaines. La méthode appliquée pour la construction de l’analyse a été une méthode heuristique dont les résultats ont donné une visibilité à quatre aspects généraux: la culture scientifique comme moyen de qualifier l’éducation scolaire en Sciences Humaines, le renforcement d’une vision de l’éducation scolaire basée sur des valeurs scientifiques, la valorisation des pratiques comme lieu d’expérience formative et la viabilité de la culture scientifique à être pensée comme une pratique sociale.
Téléchargements
Références
An, S. (2020). Learning racial literacy while navigating white social studies. The Social Studies, 111(4), 174-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2020.1718584
Anyanwu, R., & Le Grange, L. (2017). The influence of teacher variables on climate change science literacy of geography teachers in the Western Cape, South Africa. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(3), 193-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1330039
Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20446
Burke, K. J., Greene, S., & McKenna, M. K. (2016). A critical geographic approach to youth civic engagement: Reframing educational opportunity zones and the use of public spaces. Urban Education, 51(2), 143-169. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0042085914543670
Cataldo, T. T., Langer, K., Buhler, A. G., Putnam, S. R., Elrod, R., Faniel, I. M., Connaway, L. S., Cyr, C., Brannon, B., Valenza, J. K., Hood, E. M., & Graff, R. A. (2019). Science and news: A study of students’ judgments of online scientific news information. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (93). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl25
Cowgill, D., & Waring, S. (2017). Historical thinking: An evaluation of student and teacher ability to analyze sources. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 8(1), 115-145. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1141860.pdf
De La Paz, S., Monte-Sano, C., Felton, M., Croninger, R., Jackson, C., & Piantedosi, K. W. (2017). A historical writing apprenticeship for adolescents: Integrating disciplinary learning with cognitive strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 31-52. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26622577
Diáz, M. J. G. (Ed.). (2018). Alfabetización científica en la escuela: Propuesta de una nueva metodologia. Unesco. http://hdl.handle.net/10261/171151
Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268-291. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0091732X07309371
Duhaylongsod, L., Snow, C. E., Selman, R. L., & Donovan, M. S. (2015). Toward disciplinary literacy: Dilemmas and challenges in designing history curriculum to support middle school students. Harvard Educational Review, 85(4), 587-608. http://dx.doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.4.587
Emran, A., Spektor-Levy, O., Tal, O. P., & Assaraf, O. B. Z. (2020). Understanding students’ perceptions of the nature of science in the context of their gender and their parents’ occupation. Science & Education, 29(2), 237-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00103-z
Ford, M. J. (2015). Educational implications of choosing “practice” to describe science in the next generation science standards. Science Education, 99(6), 1041-1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21188
Gadsden, V., Johnson, W. F., & Rahman, S. (2019). Civic knowledge, engagement, and participation narratives of youth of color in urban schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 94(1), 78-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2019.1553585
Gil Pérez, D., & Vilches Peña, A. (2006). Educación ciudadana y alfabetización científica: Mitos y realidades. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 42(1), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie420760
Gleason, B. (2018). Thinking in hashtags: Exploring teenagers’ new literacies practices on twitter.
Learning, Media and Technology, 43(2), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1462207
Hintermann, C., Bergmeister, F. M., & Kessel, V. A. (2020). Critical geographic media literacy in geography education: Findings from the MiDENTITY Project in Austria. Journal of Geography, 119(4), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2020.1761430
Horn, S., & Veermans, K. (2019). Critical thinking efficacy and transfer skills defend against ‘fake news’ at an international school in Finland. Journal of Research in International Education, 18(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1475240919830003
Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Journal of the Association and Supervision and Curriculum Development, (13-52). http://edcipr.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Hurd_1958_Science-literacy.pdf
Jaeger, E. (2016). Authors and citizens: Sociological imagination and the writing of evidence-based argument. Literacy, 50(2), 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12078
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Crujeiras, B. (2017). Epistemic practices and scientific practices in science education. In K. S. Taber, & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science education: New directions in mathematics and science education (pp. 69-80). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-749-8_5
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo Rodríguez, A., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Argument in High School Genetics, Science Education, 84(6), 757-792. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6%3C757::AID-SCE5%3E3.0.CO;2-F
Kind, P., & Osborne, J. (2017). Styles of scientific reasoning: A cultural rationale for science education? Science Education, 20(10), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21251
Kinslow, A. T., Sadler, T. D., & Nguyen, H. T. (2019). Socio-scientific reasoning and environmental literacy in a field based ecology class. Environmental Education Research, 25(3), 388-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1442418
Kucan, L., Rainey, E., & Byeong-Young, C. (2018). Engaging middle school students in disciplinary literacy through culturally relevant historical inquiry. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.940
Lawrence, S., Langan, E., & Maurer, J. (2019). Using primary sources in content areas to increase disciplinary literacy instruction. Language and Literacy Spectrum, 29(1). https://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/lls/vol29/iss1/1
Learned, J. E. (2018). Doing history: A study of disciplinary literacy and readers labeled as struggling. Journal of Literacy Research, 50(2), 190-216. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1086296X17746446
Lorimer, M. R. (2019). Engaging adolescent struggling readers through decision-making role-play simulation: Using primary source documents. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(3), 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1523029
Maddox, L., & Saye, J. (2017). Using hybrid assessments to develop civic competency in history. Social Studies, 108(2), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2017.1283288
Meloche, A., Lee, V. J., Grant, A., & DeCarlo, M. J. T. (2020). Critical literacy as a lens for students’ evaluation of sources in an AP World History Class. Social Studies, 111(4), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2020.1727828
Meydan, A. (2017). The contribution of scientific project competitions upon high school students’ acquiring a scientific viewpoint (Geography Lesson Case). Journal of Education and Learning, 6(2), 294-304. http://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n2p294
Middaugh, E. (2019). More than just facts: Promoting civic media literacy in the Era of Outrage. Peabody Journal of Education, 94(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2019.1553582
Newman, B. M., & Rosas, P. (2016). Opening the door for cross-disciplinary literacy: Doing history and writing in a high school to university collaboration. English Journal, 106(2), 54-61. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26450209
Park, J. Y. (2016). “He didn’t add more evidence”: Using historical graphic novels to develop language learners’ disciplinary literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.521
Santos, W. L. P. (2007). Educação científica na perspectiva de alfabetização como prática social: Funções, princípios e desafios. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 12(36), 474-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782007000300007
Sasseron, L. H., & Carvalho, A. M. P. (2011). Alfabetização científica: uma revisão bibliográfica. Investigações em ensino de Ciências, 16(1), 59-77. http://www.if.ufrgs.br/ienci/artigos/Artigo_ID254/v16_n1_a2011.pdf
Siegner, A., & Stapert, N. (2020). Climate change education in the humanities classroom: A case study of the Lowell school curriculum pilot. Environmental Education Research, 26(4), 511-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1607258
Spires, H. A., Kerkhoff, S. N., Graham, A. C. K., Thompson, I., & Lee, J. K. (2018). Operationalizing and validating disciplinary literacy in secondary education. Reading and Writing, 31(1), 1401-1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9839-4
Stroupe, D. (2015). Describing “science practice” in learning settings. Science Education, 99(6), 1033-1040. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21191
Swanson, E., Wanzek, J., McCulley, L., Stilman-Spisak, S., Vaughn, S., Simmons, D., Fogarty, M., & Hairrel, A. (2016). Literacy and text reading in middle and high school social studies and English language arts classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32(3), 199-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.910718
Vargas, L., & Erba, J. (2017). Cultural competence development, critical service learning, and Latino/a youth empowerment: A qualitative case study. Journal of Latinos and Education, 16(3), 203-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2016.1229614
Vizzotto, P. A., & Pino, J. C. D. (2020). O uso do teste de alfabetização científica básica no Brasil: Uma revisão da literatura. Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 22(1), Artigo e15846. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172020210116
Wilder, P., & Msseemmaa, D. (2019). Centering disciplinary literacies on student consciousness: A Tanzanian case study. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62(5), 479-484. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.880
Wineburg, S., & Reisman, A. (2015). Disciplinary literacy in history: A toolkit for digital citizenship. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(8), 636-639. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.410
Xuan, X., Jin, Q., Jo, I., Duan, Y., & Kim, M. (2019). The potential contribution of geography curriculum to scientific literacy. Journal of Geography, 118(5), 185-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2019.1611906
Yacoubian, H. (2018). Scientific literacy for democratic decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 40(3), 308-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1420266
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Cadernos de Pesquisa 2023
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
a. Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
b. Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c. Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho on-line (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
